Good game. Ready when you are. Yoda should be playing us both simultaneously. And blindfolded.
@ that ending. You essentially mated yourself.---
Tell me to get back to rewriting this site so it's not horrible on mobileSteelAttack said:
Good game. Ready when you are. Yoda should be playing us both simultaneously. And blindfolded.
I'm up for it.
---
Tell me to get back to rewriting this site so it's not horrible on mobileYodariquo said:SteelAttack said:
Good game. Ready when you are. Yoda should be playing us both simultaneously. And blindfolded.I'm up for it.
Ok start a game with me. and yes I mated myself, I totally didnt see it.
Yodariquo said:SteelAttack said:
Good game. Ready when you are. Yoda should be playing us both simultaneously. And blindfolded.I'm up for it.
Holy shit can you play blindfolded?!?!
And Steel/Dvader, either set up games between each other or use a separate program to keep track yourself.
---
Tell me to get back to rewriting this site so it's not horrible on mobileGotta take off for a while. Will probably continue tomorrow.
SteelAttack said:
Gotta take off for a while. Will probably continue tomorrow.
ok
Dvader said:Yodariquo said:SteelAttack said:
Good game. Ready when you are. Yoda should be playing us both simultaneously. And blindfolded.I'm up for it.
Ok start a game with me. and yes I mated myself, I totally didnt see it.
Damn hemaphrodites.
Yodariquo said:And Steel/Dvader, either set up games between each other or use a separate program to keep track yourself.
I am going to make my own board with some used cardboard boxes, draw the squares with a pencil, and use beans as pieces.
Yoda, I lost the placement of the game again, sorry. I gave the info you sent me last time, I think we moved like 3 times since then.
http://thevgpress.com/forumtopics/chess-an-introduction-to-opening-theory_1067.html
Hopefully it'll be of some help.
---
Tell me to get back to rewriting this site so it's not horrible on mobile
Computer glitch may have led to Deep Blue's historic win over chess champ Kasparov
Earlier this year, IBM celebrated the 15-year anniversary of its supercomputer Deep Blue beating chess champion Garry Kasparov. According to a new book, however, it may have been an accidental glitch rather than computing firepower that gave Deep Blue the win.
At the Washington Post, Brad Plumer highlights a passage from Nate Silver's The Signal and the Noise. Silver interviewed Murray Campbell, a computer scientist that worked on Deep Blue, who explained that during the 1997 tournament the supercomputer suffered from a bug in the first game. Unable to pick a strategic move because of the glitch, it resorted to its fall-back mechanism: choosing a play at random. "A bug occurred in the game and it may have made Kasparov misunderstand the capabilities of Deep Blue," Campbell tells Silver in the book. "He didn't come up with the theory that the move it played was a bug."
As Silver explains it, Kasparov may have taken his own inability to understand the logic of Deep Blue's buggy move as a sign of the computer's superiority. Sure enough, Kasparov began having difficulty in the second game of the tournament — and Deep Blue ended up winning in the end.
---
Tell me to get back to rewriting this site so it's not horrible on mobile---
Tell me to get back to rewriting this site so it's not horrible on mobile
Glitch or or SkyNet autonomy?
Oh... crap.
EDIT: OMG.