Forum > Non-Gaming Discussion > Books of 2019
Books of 2019
- The Lord of the Rings (J.R.R. Tolkien) was great but felt repetitive towards the end.
- I Capture the Castle (Dodie Smith) was fun.
- Orlando (Virginia Woolf) was my favourite bus book of the year.
- Snow Crash (Neal Stephenson) shows that post-cyberpunk is more interesting than cyberpunk, at least if I'm basing each genre on only one book each.
- Spinning Silver (Naomi Novik) was disappointing but enjoyable.
- The Rings of Saturn (W.G. Sebald) did not inspire the song it was meant to.
- The Hobbit (J.R.R. Tolkien) was less interesting to me than The Lord of the Rings.
- The Priory of the Orange Tree (Samantha Shannon) tried hard and succeeded mostly.
- A Room with a View (E.M. Forster) was a better movie than book.
- Twilight (Stephenie Meyer) wasn't so terrible.
- Colorless Tsukuru Tazaki (Haruki Murakami) was one of his shorter books and pretty straightforward. Not as many crazy things happened.
- The Turn of the Screw (Henry James) was tedious.
- Blood of Empire (Brian McClellan) was my least favourite of the Powder Mage books.
- Four Sisters (Helen Rappaport) gave me another perspective of late imperial and early revolutionary Russia.
I also read eighteen other things.
Edited: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 08:44:16
By Miu Watanabe.
Log in or Register for free to comment
Recently Spotted:
*crickets*
I had a better version of this, but accidentally closed the tab. Anyway, rather than a list of books, here's a summary of what I learnt from reading a book every second day last year.
1. I used to be sceptical of the claims that the "West" is based structurally (whatever that means) on white supremacy and patriarchy (and I still find that these claims inherently white/sex wash history to some degree), but these claims suddenly become perfectly reasonable when I actually read "Western" philosophy and first-hand political books. That said, those making the claims are usually pretty bad at making it. The books making these claims, I found to be unconvincing, even though looking at the evidence suggests they are in some way right—if not in the way that they make their claims.
2. L. Frank Baum remains the greatest American novelist (sorry Melville), though John Steinbeck shocked me with East of Eden and Grapes of Wrath (arguably the greatest socialist realism novel ever), which are way better than anything I expected him to be capable of writing after reading Of Mice and Men.
3. Aristotle is an idiot. This dimwit apparently invented logic, but he's terrible at it. His political science is pretty solid, though crippled by sycophantry. He's also a great character in Plato.
4. Ayn Rand is even stupider than her hero, Aristotle. This dumb cunt re-wrote a short story (Anthem) from early in her career into her 1,168 page magnum opus, Atlas Shrugged. That is enough to demonstrate how stupid she is. But to top it off, the book is an act of intellectual suicide. The Fountainhead was an interesting tribute to singular genius (albeit one that failed in the end, due to it justifying the protagonist with an appeal to power, rather than through his own actions and achievements) and even featured some amusing satirising of disingenuous socialists. Atlas Shrugged, on the other hand, is all one massive appeal to authority completely bereft of individual genius, and its depiction of its enemies bear absolutely no relation to reality.
5. Confederate-Nostalgics are idiots. They love Faulkner, whose books are the most bitter, hate-filled and powerful refutations of everything these morons believe in. What.
6. I used to be sceptical of people accusing "leftists" of being "communists", because most "leftist" positions are so pathetically milk-and-toast-y. But after reading The Communist Manifesto I discovered that such shocking positions as socialised education and fault-free divorces are indeed fundamental communist positions. So the next time you see Fox news accusing Bernie Sanders of being a communist, know that for once they're telling the truth!
7. Mervyn Peake, not Tolkien, is the greatest fantasist; he's even better than L. Frank Baum!
8. Christina Stead is what Ayn Rand wishes she could be, and also one of Australia's (therefore the world's) greatest novelists. The Man Who Loved Children features the most horrific, disgusting depiction of annoying American liberal socialists (though Sam could just as easily be Australian or from anywhere), and For Love Alone is one of the greatest tributes to the individual human spirit and romance ever.
9. Speaking of romance, Twilight is actually good. Really good, even. Not only is the depiction of vampires original in an interesting way (vampires are the X-Men), but it's very refreshing to see love depicted as an experience of slavery, not liberation, in a modern book. No wonder it has split readers in two (with an impossibly perfect vampire cock, no less), as love today is meant to be a liberating, negotiated experience. But it isn’t. And even if it were, what would be the point in it?
10. "Westerners" are dumb. Like, really dumb. Aristotle, as said above, is an idiot. But worse than that, Christian theology is a joke if you've ready any Buddhism, Hinduism, or even some Sufi poetry! That said, the narcissistic pacifism and pity of the likes of Saints Therese and Gemma Galgani and the mystical visions and theories of the likes of Saints Hippolytus of Rome, Basil the Great, The Cloud of Unknowing, Teresa of Avilla, are all beautifully radiant with the joy of living.
11. Credit where it's due, though. The Praise of Folly is absolutely hilarious. Much funnier than Buddhist jokes, albeit not so insightful.
12. Skinner was a terrible rhetorician. Read the brilliant Beyond Freedom and Dignity to learn both a few insights into behaviour, and also how to make your ideas as unpalatable to as many people as possible so that you ruin your reputation and fade into obscurity outside of as a symbol of evil and in the spheres of science actually concerned with your work. What a fucking idiot—and he wanted to be a writer, too! Lord help us!
13. Vikings are pussy-cats. The Norse religion is much more primitive than anyone wants to admit. It does have a sense of humour, though: Erik the Viking is the closest thing in modern culture to the Edda! In any case, Beowulf would eat Thor for breakfast (very politely, because he's a gentleman).
14. The "left-wing" of politics can be defined by self-hatred. It's usually pretty angry about something people in its in-group are doing.
15. The "right-wing" of politics can be defined by self-pity. It's usually pretty upset about how it's being treated. Which makes much of it pretty insufferable. So much petty whining!