Forum > Gaming Discussion > Watchdogs Delayed. Seriously, What's Going On?
Watchdogs Delayed. Seriously, What's Going On?
avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 19390
News Posts: 9409
Joined: 2008-08-18
 
Fri, 18 Oct 2013 08:25:06
0

The speculation I've heard:

  • The XB1 version was just not holding up and needed more develpoment time.
  • Splinter Cell and Rayman tanked and Ubi wants to push off The Crew and Watchdogs into a different financial reporting period.
  • Ubi waiting long enough to see what the launches are like for the new systems, to see if they need to emphasize this as a current gen game.

Personally, I don't give a shit about this game or anything Ubi does, but I find the speculation to be interesting and would be even more interested in your speculation and thoughts about this delay.

avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 48541
News Posts: 59787
Joined: 2008-06-21
 
Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:43:20
+1

I have no idea, I cannot remember the last time ubi delayed a game like this. I think they want to make sure they get it absolutely right as a next gen game so it can flourish with more sequels. I think they said something akin to that. But they usually just get the games out there regardless of how buggy they are.

avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 15645
News Posts: 479
Joined: 2008-07-03
 
Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:48:26
+1

I'm guessing that's going to be their premier series like Prince of Persia two generations ago and Assassin's Creed this gen.

avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 19390
News Posts: 9409
Joined: 2008-08-18
 
Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:17:27
0
gamingeek said:

I have no idea, I cannot remember the last time ubi delayed a game like this. I think they want to make sure they get it absolutely right as a next gen game so it can flourish with more sequels. I think they said something akin to that. But they usually just get the games out there regardless of how buggy they are.

Rayman: Legends.  But that was pretty clear as to why they did it.  You bring up the other thing I heard too, that it's not baked yet and since they need it to be an annual franchise it has to be good.

The other theory I heard is that they think it is too close to the wake of GTAV.

avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 48541
News Posts: 59787
Joined: 2008-06-21
 
Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:33:43
+1

Yeah I thought of Rayman Legends but it was essentially complete and ready to go out when they delayed it and the most logical theory is because of Microsoft policies stipulating same day release dates.

avatar
Country: US
Comments: 17994
News Posts: 771
Joined: 2009-02-25
 
Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:38:01
0

Ubi realized no one wants anything having to do with Chicago and is now remaking the game's setting in a more appealing place like Boise, Idaho.

avatar
Country: US
Comments: 15369
News Posts: 232
Joined: 2008-06-21
 
Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:40:15
+1

I think that

  • They don't want this game and Ass Creed 4 competing for $$$
  • Watch Dogs is not as polished as it needs to be for the WOW factor they are going for, and it needs more time.

Those are the only two things that make any sense. I'm honestly surprised more about Splinter Cell "tanking"? Doesn't SC always sell great? What happened here?

         1200923.png?77682175

avatar
Country: US
Comments: 31784
News Posts: 1717
Joined: 2008-06-22
 
Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:18:19
+1
edgecrusher said:

I think that

  • They don't want this game and Ass Creed 4 competing for $$$
  • Watch Dogs is not as polished as it needs to be for the WOW factor they are going for, and it needs more time.

Those are the only two things that make any sense. I'm honestly surprised more about Splinter Cell "tanking"? Doesn't SC always sell great? What happened here?

Its this right here. The $$$ being the biggest factor.

660896.png
avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 48541
News Posts: 59787
Joined: 2008-06-21
 
Fri, 18 Oct 2013 20:11:26
+1

But aren't they potentially losing hundreds of millions in revenue? And their share price is 25% to 30% down according to recent reports. Maybe testers found the game just wasn't good enough in the coming together stages?

avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 19390
News Posts: 9409
Joined: 2008-08-18
 
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 00:10:40

Maybe ZombieU scared them off big title launches as well (for new IP).  Fuck I don't know. Probably what Vader said combined with a bit of everything else.

avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 16257
News Posts: 1043
Joined: 2008-06-21
 
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 03:07:21

The sales success of Rayman demonstrated that needlessly delaying a game to improve sales does exactly that. It's a tried and true sales technique for them now.

Let's not forget about the terrible press they've been receiving lately. "Watch Dogs is not as polished..." No one would have been saying that before the shitty trailer was released. Or maybe they would? After the completely over the top reaction to the graphics on initial reveal I haven't been paying attention.

avatar
Country: US
Comments: 17994
News Posts: 771
Joined: 2009-02-25
 
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:53:52
Foolz said:

The sales success of Rayman demonstrated that needlessly delaying a game to improve sales does exactly that. It's a tried and true sales technique for them now.

But Rayman bombed. It wasn't successful anywhere.

avatar
Country: US
Comments: 17994
News Posts: 771
Joined: 2009-02-25
 
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:56:01
+1

I was giving this a little serious thought, and I think Ubisoft is actuallly doing this in anticipation of another next gen software slump. I'm sure they will be putting some extra polish on it during that time, but it's not unlikely that this spring will be very much last the Wii U's spring and completely barren. What better time to release a high profile game then when there's nothing else coming out? Then again I haven't looked at any software calendar's so that could just be me talking out of my ass.

avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 48541
News Posts: 59787
Joined: 2008-06-21
 
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 13:27:34
+1
robio said:

But Rayman bombed. It wasn't successful anywhere.

Sarcasm detection broken Nyaa

avatar
Country: US
Comments: 17994
News Posts: 771
Joined: 2009-02-25
 
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 13:59:56

That was bad sarcasm. It went on too long.

avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 16257
News Posts: 1043
Joined: 2008-06-21
 
Sun, 20 Oct 2013 03:02:21

Says the American in reply to the Englishman.

avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 48541
News Posts: 59787
Joined: 2008-06-21
 
Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:56:36
+1

I just assume everything Foolz says is sarcasm Nyaa

Log in or Register for free to comment
Recently Spotted:
*crickets*
Login @ The VG Press
Username:
Password:
Remember me?